Over the past few days I’ve been reading the story of Joseph and his brothers. There’s beauty in the story, and tragedy. There are things that make sense, and things that kind of don’t. The brothers were the sons of Jacob, the man I discussed in my last post. There was little noble about Jacob, other than that he sought the blessings of God, and yet he was renamed Israel and became the father of a nation, God’s chosen people. God’s unusual choices continue in the narrative.
The nation of Israel consisted of 13 tribes named after 11 of Jacob’s sons and two of his grandsons – Ephraim and Manasseh. Ephraim and Manasseh were Joseph’s sons, and they each received a full allotment of Jacob’s blessing as though they were Jacob’s sons. As most people know, Jesus was descended from Jacob (Israel), as are all Jews. But many may not know which son of Jacob was Jesus’ ancestor.
It stands to reason that Jesus would be descended from Joseph – the most righteous of Jacob’s sons. So highly was Joseph esteemed that he effectively received a double portion of Jacob’s blessing – each of this two sons received a full share of the promise. But neither Ephraim nor Manasseh are in Jesus’ family tree.
Benjamin maybe? He was the one son who didn’t betray Joseph and sell him into slavery, he was adored by his father and brother Joseph. No, it wasn’t Benjamin.
How about Reuben, the one son who lobbied to spare Joseph’s life and who tried to rescue him before he was sold? No, it wasn’t Reuben.
None of the likely candidates is in Christ’s lineage. Instead, of all Jacob’s sons, Jesus’ earthly ancestor was Judah. Hundreds of years before Jesus’ birth it was prophesied that the Messiah would come from the Tribe of Judah. What do we know about Judah the man? Primarily that he had sex with his daughter-in-law when he mistook her for a temple prostitute. As a result of that union, she gave birth to twins – Perez and Zerah. Perez was Jesus’ ancestor.
I draw two conclusions from this story. First, the story has veracity. No one making these things up would have chosen Judah to be the father of the savior of the world. It just wouldn’t fit the narrative. Second (and more significantly), the story evidences the following characteristic of God – he has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, so that no man may boast before God. (I Corinthians 1:27)
I rejoice that God’s plan does not rely on the righteousness of his chosen people. If a righteousness of my own making were necessary, I would be useless to the kingdom and without hope of reconciliation to a righteous God. But because God is who he is, and because he has chosen me, I need rely only on his unchanging and enduring promises.
